Coming to campus? Visit this page for important information.

Seminar to discuss categorization of argumentation research

To have an overview of research done in informal logic, it is necessary to have a way to classify the work, says philosophy professor Hans V. Hansen.

“An ideal set of categories would be complete, determinate, and useful,” he says.

  • Complete: every item of research in the data base should fit into one or another of the categories.
  • Determinate: every item in the data base should fit into only one of the categories.
  • Useful: the purpose of the classification should be clear and guide the selection of categories.

Dr. Hansen, a fellow of the Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric, will lead a discussion seminar on the topic, entitled “Classifying argumentation research,” Thursday, November 6, at 4 p.m. in room 209, Essex Hall.

He acknowledges his guidelines above require more thought and elaboration and invites participants to bring their own ideas to the discussion.